![]() ![]() The study explored how far national statistics can provide such data and developed a concept for collation on European level. ![]() As overarching issues, ways to collect data on pretrial detention and its surrogates and on aliens stemming from EU member states compared to those from other states were sought. ![]() Data collection possibilities regarding compulsory measures in the investigatory stage were tested, and a more sophisticated approach for recording sanctions and measures had been developed, as well as for prison data. Based on the results of recent projects of one of the editors (Jörg-Martin Jehle), the prosecution chapter of the ESB questionnaire was changed and expanded. Also, further crime types, especially those subject to EU-harmonized definition, were tested and introduced. Possibilities to improve the offence definitions used so far in the ESB context were explored. It utilized questionnaires filled by an established European network. Based upon work done by the European Sourcebook experts’ group in creating the European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics (ESB), the project intended to improve and complement the standards developed so far for definitions and statistical registration in four fields, in order to contribute to the picture of criminal justice in Europe. The study presented in this book is a direct response to the needs for defining and registering criminal and judicial data on the European level. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |